Most postings never say where the work is. Among those that do, remote dominates — and it pays more.
| Measure | ||
|---|---|---|
| Postings that state the arrangement | 5.9% | of all postings |
| Remote (of those that state it) | 55.5% | |
| Hybrid / on-site (of stated) | 36.7% / 7.8% | |
| Remote vs on-site pay gap | 10.3% | $105,894 vs $96,033 |
| Remote-friendly (of all) | 3.3% | many postings stay silent |
3.3% of all postings are remote-friendly; among postings that state an arrangement, remote is 55.5%.
On stated USD pay, remote averages about 10.3% above non-remote.
94.1% of postings never state an arrangement, so the overall share understates remote work.
Where this connects. Outside work that defines or studies the measure on this page:
Need a different cut? Every figure on this page comes from one index, so we can extract almost any slice on request — a city, a role, an industry, a time window, or a comparison between platforms. Tell us what you need at [email protected] and we will pull it, publish it with its method, and hand you the numbers. All we ask in return is a citation.
“Still listed” is a listing-age measure from the source publish date, not a verification that a role is open; link liveness is measured separately. The percentages are the October 2026 edition (full pass, measured 2026-10-06); the index counts are rebuilt by every nightly update, most recently 2026-11-11. Page generated 2026-11-11.