Sometimes a posting calls itself senior while the role is a first job, or reaches for ‘guru’ where ‘specialist’ would do. We look for titles that claim rank or stature the rest of the posting does not support — and we count only what we can defend from the text.
| Measure | ||
|---|---|---|
| Postings with an inflated title | 0.1% | conservative detector — we prefer to under-claim |
| Rank words on roles without scope | lead 1,075 · senior 540 · sr 81 | a rank in the title where nobody is led |
| Hype words | guru 958 · maestro 434 · wrangler 123 | guru, maestro, wrangler, evangelist, ninja, maven |
| ‘Fancy office’ phrasing | 323 | perks framed as culture |
Two things: rank language applied to roles with no people or scope (lead, senior, sr), and hype language standing in for a real title (guru, maestro, ninja, evangelist, maven, wrangler).
Because we count only cases we can defend from the posting text. A looser keyword count would produce a bigger and weaker number — we would rather under-claim.
No. It is usually enthusiastic copywriting, and sometimes a small team giving a real job a grander name. We measure the language, not the intent.
Need a different cut? Every figure on this page comes from one index, so we can extract almost any slice on request — a city, a role, an industry, a time window, or a comparison between platforms. Tell us what you need at [email protected] and we will pull it, publish it with its method, and hand you the numbers. All we ask in return is a citation.
“Still listed” is a listing-age measure from the source publish date, not a verification that a role is open; link liveness is measured separately. The percentages are the September 2026 edition (full pass, measured 2026-09-15); the index counts are rebuilt by every nightly update, most recently 2026-09-20. Page generated 2026-09-21.